In a move that has sparked nationwide debate and international backlash, President Donald Trump has signed Executive Order 14172, officially renaming the Gulf of Mexico to the “Gulf of America” for all U.S. federal agencies. The decision, announced on January 20, 2025, has drawn strong reactions from political leaders, corporations, media organizations, and foreign governments.
Support from Corporate America
Several major corporations, including BP, Chevron, Shell, Google, Microsoft, and Apple, have begun adopting the new designation in their official communications and maps. The move aligns with the federal government’s directive and highlights the influence of the administration over corporate policies. Some executives argue that the change reflects America’s significant economic and energy interests in the region.
Media Resistance and Press Freedom Concerns
Not all institutions are following suit. The Associated Press (AP) has refused to adopt the new name, continuing to refer to the body of water as the “Gulf of Mexico.” This decision has resulted in a heated dispute between the news organization and the White House, culminating in AP journalists being banned indefinitely from the Oval Office and Air Force One. The Trump administration has accused the AP of spreading misinformation, while the AP has defended its stance as a commitment to journalistic integrity and historical accuracy.
International and Public Reactions
The renaming has been met with strong opposition from Mexico, which views the move as an affront to its sovereignty and historical ties to the region. Mexican officials have called on the U.S. government to reconsider the decision, emphasizing the long-standing name’s cultural and historical significance.
A recent Reuters/Ipsos poll suggests that a majority of Americans also disapprove of the change, viewing it as an unnecessary political maneuver rather than a practical adjustment. However, some coastal states, including Texas and Florida, have begun using the term “Gulf of America” in state government documents to align with federal regulations.
Implications and Future Outlook
The renaming of the Gulf has ignited discussions about the power of executive orders, the role of corporate compliance in political decisions, and potential risks to press freedom. Critics argue that such unilateral changes could strain international relations, while supporters claim it reinforces American dominance in the region.
As the controversy unfolds, it remains to be seen whether the name change will endure or if public and diplomatic pressure will force a reversal. For now, the “Gulf of America” remains a symbol of the ongoing political and cultural divide within the United States and beyond.
